RATNAM
V. Veeramani – Appellant
Versus
Madurai Dist. Cooperative Supply and Marketing Society Limited, Madurai and Another – Respondent
Ratnam, J.
An interesting question in the realm of industrial jurisprudence arises for our consideration and decision in this appeal. To lay bare that question and to highlight the controversy, the factual backdrop may be briefly noticed. One Thiru Veeranan was a senior clerk in the Madurai District Co-operative Supply and Marketing Society Ltd. He was placed in charge of Srinivasa Mills for a brief period during which a shortage in the stock of grains and pulses was detected in the godown in respect whereof Veeranan was also charge-sheeted. A domestic enquiry followed his explanation and as a result of the findings arrived at, Veeranan was dismissed from service. This led to a reference by the Government under Section10(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) to the Labour Court, Madurai, in I.D. No. 65 of 1970 in the following terms :
"1. Whether the non-employment of Thiru C. Veeranan (Godown clerk) is justified, if not, to what relief he would be entitled ?
2. To compute the relief, if any, awarded, in terms of money, if it can be so computed." *
Pending adjudication of this reference, Veeranan died on 26th January, 1973. The appell
AMBABAI MANJUNATH AMIN VS P. L. MAJUMDAR - 1985 0 Supreme(Bom) 362: Veeramani v. M. D. C. S. & M. S. L. and Another 1983 II LLJ 88.
Treatment unclear. This case is cited in the second entry ("contended that the ... Veeramani v. ..."), but no explicit treatment language (e.g., followed, overruled, distinguished) is provided. The context implies it was argued or referenced, but the outcome of that contention is not specified here.
General Manager Indian Overseas Bank VS S. Ganesan - 2018 0 Supreme(Mad) 2763: Madurai District Co-operative Supply and Marketing Society Ltd., and another [1983-96-L.W. 48 : 1983 1 LLN 426], contended that the ... Veeramani v. ... Spencer & Co., Ltd., Madras and another [1986 (1) LLN 469]. The application was dismissed.
Treatment unclear. This entry describes a case where something was "contended" referencing Veeramani v. ... and Spencer & Co., and notes "The application was dismissed." No explicit treatment indicators for this case itself or the cited cases (e.g., overruled, followed). The dismissal pertains to an application in this context, but does not clearly indicate judicial treatment of the precedent cases.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.