SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(Mad) 94

High Court of Judicature at Madras
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T N SINGARAVELU & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASWAMI
Jayaprakash Match Works, Kovilpatti and Others - Appellant
Versus
Union of India and Others - Respondent
Case No : W.P. Nos. 10045 etc. of 1981
Decided On : 03 March 1982

Advocates Appeared:M/s. M.R.M. Abdul Karim, S.A. Karim, K.A. Jaffar, Abdul Nazeer, Mr. K.N. Balasubramaniam, Advocates.

The Central Government has the power to impose conditions for grant of exemption from excise duty on excisable goods under Rule 8 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, and such conditions can be based on factors that are relevant to the purpose of exemption.

Headnote:

CENTRAL EXCISE - EXEMPTION - MATCHES - NOTIFICATION NO. 137 OF 1981 - VALIDITY - CONDITIONS IMPOSED FOR GRANT OF EXEMPTION - RELEVANCE - POWER OF CENTRAL GOVERNMENT TO IMPOSE CONDITIONS - SCOPE.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners, manufacturers of matches without the aid of power, challenged the validity of Notification No. 137 of 1981 issued by the Central Government under Rule 8(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, which granted exemption from excise duty on matches subject to certain conditions, including the use of cardboard for the outer slide or inner slide of the matchboxes. The petitioners contended that the conditions imposed were not germane or relevant to the purpose of exemption and were beyond the powers of the Central Government.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that the conditions imposed by Notification No. 137 of 1981 were neither arbitrary nor irrational and had a relevance to the exemption as such. The court noted that the purpose of the Act included control of the production and manufacture of excisable goods and that the policy of the Government could vary from time to time according to circumstances and economic considerations.

Issues: 1. Whether the conditions imposed by Notification No. 137 of 1981 for grant of exemption from excise duty on matches were germane or relevant to the purpose of exemption? 2. Whether the Central Government had the power to impose such conditions under Rule 8 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944?

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court held that the conditions imposed by Notification No. 137 of 1981 were relevant to the purpose of exemption as they were based on the material used for making the matchboxes, which was a factor that could be taken into account by the Government in determining the rate of duty. 2. The court held that the Central Government had the power to impose such conditions under Rule 8 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, as the rule authorized the Government to exempt any excisable goods from the whole or any part of duty leviable on such goods subject to such conditions as may be specified in the notification.

Final Decision: The court dismissed the writ petitions and upheld the validity of Notification No. 137 of 1981.

Judgment :-

V. RAMASWAMI J.

In this batch of writ petitions the validity of Notification No. 137 of 1981, Central Excise, dated 2-7-1981, issued by the Central Government in exercise of their powers under Rule 8(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 giving exemption to a limited extent in respect of excise duty leviable on certain conditions is questioned. In Form the petitioners have prayed for a writ of Mandamus directing the Union of India and the Superintendent of Central Excise to forbear from collecting excise duty on matches in excess of that which is payable under Notification No. 42 of 1981. All these petitioners are manufacturers of matches without the aid of power who may be hereafter designated as non-mechanised sector manufacturers. In order to appreciate the point raised in these writ petitions, it is necessary to set out the Notification which have a relevance to the question. Notification No. 42 of 1981 issued under rule 8 reads as follows :-

"GSR....In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-rule (1) of Rule 8 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, the Central Government hereby exempts matches in or in relation to the manufacture of which none of the following mechanical prccessess, namely :-

(i) box making;

(ii) frame filling;

(iii) dipping of splints in the composition for match heads;

(iv) filling of boxes with matches;

(v) labelling and banderolling; and

(vi) packaging,

is ordinarily carried on with the aid of power, falling under Item No. 38 of the First Schedule to the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 (1 of 1944) and cleared for home consumption by a manufacturer from so much of the duty of excise leviable thereon as is in excess of Rs. 4.50 per gross boxes 2 of 50 matches each:Provided that-

(i) in the case of matches packed in boxes in which both the outer slide as well as the inner slide are made of cardboard, the amount of exemption shall be increased by sixty paise per gross of boxes;

(ii) in the case of matches packed in boxes in which the inner slide alone is made of cardboard, the amount of exemption shall be increased by twenty four paise per gross of boxes;

(iii) the amount of exemption shall be increased, or further increased, as the case may be, by fifty paise per gross of boxes if bamboo is used for the splints or for both splints and veneers;

(iv) if the splints of such matches are made of bamboo and the matches are packed in boxes of 40s, the rate of duty shall be four fifths of the rate applicable to matches of general description produced in the same factory but packed in boxes of 50s and if some packing in boxes of 50 is not done, it shall be four-fifths of the notionally determined rate for matches packed in boxes of 50s.

2. This notification shall come into force on the 1st day of April, 1981.'

This Notification was amended by Notification No. 140 of 1981, dated 2nd July, 1981 which reads as follows :-" *

GSR....In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-rule (1) of Rule 8 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, the Central Government hereby makes the following further amendments in the Notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) No. 42/81-CE, dated the 1st March, 1981, namely:-

In the said Notification :

(1) before clause (ii), the following clause shall be inserted, namely :-

(i) the process of giving the veneer flats or strips the configuration of a match box including the outer slide or the inner slide with the use of match paper,(ii) for clauses (v) and (vi), the following clauses shall be substituted, namely :-

"(v) the process of affixing labels, by pasting or any other means on match boxes or veneers;

(vi) banderolling; and

(viii) packaging;'

(2) In the first proviso -

(a) clauses (i) and (ii) shall be omitted; and

(b) in clause (iii), the words "or further increased as the case may be" shall be omitted;

(3) after the first proviso, the following proviso shall be inserted, namely :-" *

Provided further that nothing contained in this notification shall app]y to ma
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top