SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(Mad) 279

K.B.N.SINGH, VENUGOPAL
T. S. Cycles of India, Ambattur, Madras – Appellant
Versus
Union of India and Another – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: For

Judgment :-

VENUGOPAL J

The appellant-writ petitioner is a manufacturer of cycles. Item 35 in the First Schedule to the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 (hereinafter to be referred to as the Act) reads as follows-

"T.I. 35 Cycles, Parts of cycles other than Motor Cycles, namely

(i) Free wheels ... Rs. 2 each

(ii) Rims ... Rs. 4 each.'

2.By Finance Act, 1975, Item 68 was introduced in the First Schedule to the Act with effect from 1-3-1975 and it reads as follows :" *

T.I. 68 All other goods, not elsewhere specified.

All other goods, pot elsewhere specified, manufactured in a factory but excluding -

(a) 1% ad valorem.

"3.By Finance Act of 1976, while retaining Item 68, the word 'cycles' in item 35 was deleted and it was as under :" *

T.I. 35 Cycle parts

Parts of cycles other than motor cycle, namely-

(i) Free wheels ... Rs. 2 each

(ii) Rims ... Rs. 4 each.'

Till the introduction of item 68 on 1-3-1975, there was no levy of excise duty on cycles cleared from the factory in fully assembled condition, or cycles cleared in unassembled condition known to the trade as 'completely' knocked down condition (hereinafter to be referred as CKD condition). After the introduction of the residuary item 68,























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top