SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(Mad) 286

S.MOHAN
E. I. D. Parry (India) Limited – Appellant
Versus
Regional Commissioner Epf Tamilnadu and Another – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: For

Judgment :-

Mohan, J.

The writ petition is for the certiorari to quash the order of the Regional Commissioner, Employees' Provident Funds, made in Proceedings No. D7/TN/4101/Regl./76 dated 21st December, 1976. The writ petitioner, the Management and the Employees entered into a settlement under S.18(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 in the following terms :

"MEMORANDUM OF SETTLEMENT.

(Under S.18(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and Rule 25(1) of the Madras Industrial Disputes Rules, 1958).

Parties to E.I.D. Parry Limited, Ennore Settlement : (Compound Fertiliser Factory) and its workmen represented by the E.I.D. Parry Employees' Union, Ennore.

Representing 1. Mr. C. G. Ramanathan Employer : Special Director, E.I.D. Parry Limited, Madras.

2. Mr. S. H. Kanga, Works Manager, E.I.D. Parry Limited, Compound Fertiliser Factory, Ennore.

3. Mr. R. Ramanujam, Manager, E.I.D. Parry Limited, Personnel Department, Madras.

Representing 1. Mr. R. Kuchelan, President, employees : E.I.D. Parry Employees' Union, Ennore.

2. Mr. V. Rangan, Vice President, E.I.D. Parry Employees Union, Ennore.

3. Mr. V. Ramachandran, Vice President, E.I.D. Parry Employees' Union, Ennore.

4. Mr. P. V. Issac, General



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top