M.A.SATHAR SAYEED
Namasivayam – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
It appears from the facts of the case that the officials of the Co-opertive Land Development Bank, Sankarankoil, on 13-5-1977 at about 2-30, p.m. at Vasudevanallur, equipped with a distraint warrant, to discharge their official duties as public servants, entered into the house of the petitioner's father Mr. Periaswami Pillai for removing the articles and have thus removed the movable articles like Radio, fan, Wall-clock, etc., from the house of the petitioner's father since the petitioner's father has not paid the money due and payable to the Co-operative Society. It further appears from the arguments advanced by the petitioner's counsel and from the petition filed by the petitioner, that the petitioner's father preferred a report before the police against the high-handed action of the five officials of the Co-operative Land Development Bank for offences under Sections 147, 454, 380, 505(ii) read with Section 149 I.P.C. It was contended by the petitioner's father, that the Co-operative Land Development Bank officials have no authority to seize the articles from his house The complaint lodged by the petitioner's father to the police did not materialise and hence, a priva
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.