SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(Mad) 193

M.A.SATHAR SAYEED
Namasivayam – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:G. Krishnan, Packiaraj, M. Karpagavinayagam, Advocates.

Judgment :-

It appears from the facts of the case that the officials of the Co-opertive Land Development Bank, Sankarankoil, on 13-5-1977 at about 2-30, p.m. at Vasudevanallur, equipped with a distraint warrant, to discharge their official duties as public servants, entered into the house of the petitioner's father Mr. Periaswami Pillai for removing the articles and have thus removed the movable articles like Radio, fan, Wall-clock, etc., from the house of the petitioner's father since the petitioner's father has not paid the money due and payable to the Co-operative Society. It further appears from the arguments advanced by the petitioner's counsel and from the petition filed by the petitioner, that the petitioner's father preferred a report before the police against the high-handed action of the five officials of the Co-operative Land Development Bank for offences under Sections 147, 454, 380, 505(ii) read with Section 149 I.P.C. It was contended by the petitioner's father, that the Co-operative Land Development Bank officials have no authority to seize the articles from his house The complaint lodged by the petitioner's father to the police did not materialise and hence, a priva



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top