SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(Mad) 429

N.V.BALASUBRAMANIAN, SETHURAMAN
State of Tamil Nadu – Appellant
Versus
P. M. A. Mathurai Veerasamy and Company – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:K. S. Bakthavatsalam, Advocate.

Judgment :-

SETHURAMAN, J.

This is a revision petition filed by the State against the order of the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madurai, dated 16 August, 1976.

The assessee is carrying on business in Madurai in jaggery. During the year 1973-74, the assessee purchased jaggery from agriculturists under bought notes and cane jaggery under pattials and statements of accounts. The assessing officer noticed that the assessee has collected surchage in respect of sales of cane jaggery, though it was not entitled to do so. He accordingly held that the assessee had contravened the provisions of section 22(2) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act read with sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Tamil Nadu Sales Tax (Surcharge) Act, 1971. The collections came to Rs. 4, 808.96. The assessing officer levied Rs. 6, 213, 44 as penalty. The assessee appealed to the Appellate Assistant Commissioner, who confirmed the levy of penalty. The assessee thereafter appealed to the Tribunal. The Tribunal held that the collection of surcharge on the sales of cane jaggery fell outside the purview of section 22(2) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, and that the levy of penalty was illegal. The State has cha











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top