SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(Mad) 14

PADMANABHAN
Madras Rubber Factory – Appellant
Versus
Assistant Collector of Central Excise, Madras – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:G. Ramaswami, K. Lucose, K. Balasubramaniam, Advocates.

Judgment :-

The Madras Rubber Factory Ltd., the petitioner herein, has filed this writ petition for the issue of a writ of prohibition restraining the Assistant Collector of Central Excise, Madras, the first respondent herein, from taking any further proceedings in pursuance of the show cause notice No. V/16A/18/1/78/T. 2, dated 28-2-1978. The facts leading to the filing of the writ petition may be stated as follows : The petitioner manufactures passenger car tyres, truck tyres, tubes, tread rubber and other allied products. The petitioner has been marketing tread rubber in metal containers. With effect from 1-6-1968, tread rubber became assessable to excise duty onad valorembasis under the provisions of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 (hereinafter called the Act) and the petitioner has been paying the said duty on the tread rubber. In the beginning the price list submitted by the petitioner for tread rubber for purposes of assessment of excise duty included the value of the metal container also. The price of the metal container as certified by the Costs Accountant came to 52 paise in the value of tread rubber for 1 K.G. In 1970 the petitioner took the stand before the Centr


















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top