SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(Mad) 264

SETHURAMAN, NATARAJAN
S. P. S. Selvaraj – Appellant
Versus
V. Muthusamy Naicker – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:U.N.R. Rao, C. Daniel, R S. Venkatachari, Advocates.

Judgment :-

This appeal coming on for hearing on this day the court delivered the following order:-

2. This is a petition under section 10 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (Act No. 70 of 1971) filed by one S.P.S Selvaraj who will be herein after referred to as the petitioner, against V. Muthuswamy Naicker: the respondent. The petitioner is a partner of a firm known as M/s S.P.S Jayam & Co. which manufactures tooth powder, which is marketed under the name and style of "Gopal Tooth Powder". It has a registered trade mark, the mark having been registered on 30th April 1947 in class 3 as Mark No. 129120 in relation to the tooth powder under the law then in force viz., the Trade Marks Act, 1940. It has been renewed subsequently under the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958. It is claimed that the firms annual turnover is in the reign of Rs. 50.000 and it spends on advertisement through various media a sum of Rs. 4, 00, 000. A packet of tooth powder manufactured by the firm is said to cost about 35 paise.

3. The respondent was found to be marketing tooth powder in similar packets under the name and style of Ram Gopal Tooth Powder. A complaint was lodged before the Police and the respo

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top