SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(Mad) 192

PADMANABHAN
K. R. Ahmed Shah – Appellant
Versus
Additional Collector of Customs, Madras – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:A. Abdul Ghani, Mr. U.N.R. Rao, Advocates.

Judgment :-

The writ petition has been filed on 25-3-1977 to quash the order passed by the Special Secretary to the Government of India, the third respondent herein, in the revision application filed by the petitioner on 24-8-1973. The third respondent has levied in lieu of confiscation and re-export, a fine of Rs. 5000 and the penalty of Rs. 15000 on the petitioner. The facts leading to the filing of the writ petition may be stated as follows-The petitioner is an Indian citizen, but had been carrying on business in Saigon (South Vietnam) in the year 1970. On 7-2-1970 he arrived at Meenambakkam airport by the Air India flight from Saigon to India. In the customs examination hall, the petitioner made a declaration of his personal effects which included the following items :-

The total value of these four items, according to the petitioner, was Rs. 80, 850. On the basis of the declaration the customs authorities issued a detention receipt. It is the petitioner's case that at the time of giving the declaration, he made an oral request for re-export of the declared jewellery and diamonds as required under Ss. 77 and 80 of the Customs Act, 1962 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). He fo





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top