SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(Mad) 43

VARADARAJAN
State – Appellant
Versus
C. Sambandam – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:N. Dhinakar, Govt., (Crl. Side), R. Harikesavan, Advocates.

Judgment :-

This criminal appeal has been filed by the State against the acquittal of the respondent-accused, by the learned Sessions Judge, East Thanjavur Dn., Nagapattinam in Crl. Ap. No. 42 of 1977, which had been preferred by the accused against his conviction by the learned Sub-Divisional Judical Magistrate, Nagapattinam In C.C. 589 of 1976 of an offence punishable under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act and a sentence of rigorous imprisonment for three months and fine of Rs. 500/- imposed for that conviction.

2. The case of the prosecution was this; P.W. 1 the Food Inspector of Nanilam Panchyat purchased 660ml of milk from the accused's tea shop on Kumbakonam road at Kolathumangudy village at 11 a.m. on 7-9-1976 for 84 paise, after serving a form VI notice, Ex. P-1, under the acknowledgment, Ex. P-3 and obtaining the receipt, Ex. P-2 for the said purchase, P.W. 1 observed the necessary formalities viz. dividing the milk purchased by him into three equal parts, putting them in three separate clean bottles and sealing them and handing over one of the said bottles to the accused and sending one bottle to the Court and the third to the Public Analyst.

3. The Analyst's report,











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top