SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(Mad) 550

V.RAMASWAMY
Messrs Parry Confectionery Limited, Madras – Appellant
Versus
Government of India and Others – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:S.S.C. Natarajan, N. Inbarajan, U.N.R. Rao, Advocates.

Judgment :-

The petitioners are, among other things, manufacturers of confectionery items, in their factory situated at Nellikuppam, South Arcot Dt., Tamil Nadu. They held a Central Excise Licence for the manufacture of general confectionery items dutied under item 1-A of the First Schedule to the Central Excise and Tariff Act, 1944 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act'). In their application for central excise licence made under Rule 173(b) of the Central Excise Rules, they have mentioned 'Lozenges', as one of the items manufactured by the petitioners. These 'Lozenges' prepared by the petitioners were being assessed to the central excise duty as if they fall under item 1-A of the Schedule to the Act. The petitioners state that they have wrongly included in their application and were also paying mistakenly duty on Lozenges as if these Lozenges are also covered under item 1-A(1) of the Schedules. When the mistake was detected, they filed a petition on 20-10-1973 to the Assistant Collector of Central Excise, Pondicherry to delete lozenges from the list of excisable items mentioned in their application filed under rule 173(b) of the Central Excise Rules, and also prayed that they may


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top