SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(Mad) 113

BALASUBRAMANYAN, SETHURAMAN
Commissioner of Income Tax, Tamil Nadu Iii – Appellant
Versus
Brakes India Limited – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: For

Judgment :-

SETHURAMAN J.

The Appellate Tribunal has referred the following question under s. 256(1) of the I.T. Act, 1961

"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the technical aid fee paid by the assessee to Joseph Lucas (Industries) Ltd. of the U.K. under the collaboration agreement dated May 4, 1966, is allowable as business expenditure or whether the whole or any part of it (not exceeding 50% thereof) is liable to disallowance as capital expenditure ?" *

The relevant assessment years are 1967-68, 1968-69 and 1969-70. The assessee carries on business in the manufacture and sale of brake equipments for automobiles including commercial vehicles. It commenced its business some time in 1963. For these assessment years, the question that arose for the consideration of the ITO was, whether the technical aid fee paid to M/s. Joseph Lucas under the agreement dated May 4, 1966, could be allowed in full. This agreement had the approval of the Govt. of India and was effective from January 1, 1966. But, under the direction of the Govt. of India, a, supplemental agreement on June 2, 1969, conferred retrospective effect to the agreement with effect from April 1, 1964. The





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top