SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1977 Supreme(Mad) 25

ISMAIL, SETHURAMAN
Deputy Commissioner (C. T. ), Coimbatore – Appellant
Versus
South India Textile Research Association – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:C. Natarajan, Advocate.

Judgment :-

ISMAIL, J.

All these petitions relate to the same matter in respect of the same respondent for different years. The respondent is an institution carrying on a co-operative research in textile industry and it is supported by the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research of the Government of India. This organisation comes under the overall administrative control of the Government of India, and it is financed in equal proposition by the Government of India and the member-mills of the industry. The respondent purchased cotton for its day-to-day research activities. There is no controversy that the purchase of cotton was only for the object of consuming it is the process of the research it carries on. The yarn which is produced in the process is broken, unwound and entangled in the course of testing process and is disposed of as such. For improving productivity and quality, the respondent undertook testing and analysis of the sample and encouraged the member-mills. The respondent also assisted such member-mills in the design and lay-out of the laboratory as well as in the selection of appropriate instruments. The question for consideration was, whether the purchase of cot

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top