SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1977 Supreme(Mad) 270

High Court of Judicature at Madras
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SETHURAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BALASUBRAMANYAN
Fairmacs Trading Company - Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu - Respondent
Case No : TC No. 266 to 269 of 1974
Decided On : 16 June 1977

Advocates Appeared:G. S. Chandrasekhara Sastri, C. Venkataraman, C. Natarajan, Advocates.

The sale of goods by the assessee to ships located in the Madras Harbour were local sales and not inter-state sales, and therefore, were taxable under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959.

Headnote:

TAMIL NADU GENERAL SALES TAX ACT, 1959 - SECTION 2(N) EXPLANATION (3) - SECTION 4(2)(B) - CENTRAL SALES TAX ACT, 1956 - SECTION 3 - SECTION 4 - SALE OF GOODS - INTER-STATE SALE - MOVEMENT OF GOODS - APPROPRIATION OF GOODS - TAXABILITY - Held, that the sale of goods by the assessee to ships located in the Madras Harbour were local sales and not inter-state sales, and therefore, were taxable under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959.

Fact of the Case:

The assessee, a dealer in ship's stores and ship chandlers, imported goods from abroad for the purpose of supplying them to foreign going vessels or to Diplomatic Personnel. The goods were received in a customs bonded warehouse and were cleared under the supervision of the Customs authorities whenever they were sold by the assessee. The assessee claimed that the property in the goods passed only after the goods passed the Customs frontier and that the property did not pass in the territory of Tamil Nadu. It was further contended that the sales were in the course of export because they were to be one the board of the ship, which ultimately moved out of the Madras harbour.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that the sales were local sales and not inter-state sales, and therefore, were taxable under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959. The court found that there was no movement of the goods from one State to another under the contract, and that the sale and the movement of the goods were independent events. The court also held that the territorial waters do not form part of the State of Madras or Tamil Nadu, and therefore, the sales could not be considered as inter-state sales.

Issues: Whether the sale of goods by the assessee to ships located in the Madras Harbour were local sales or inter-state sales.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the sales were local sales and not inter-state sales, and therefore, were taxable under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959. The court found that there was no movement of the goods from one State to another under the contract, and that the sale and the movement of the goods were independent events. The court also held that the territorial waters do not form part of the State of Madras or Tamil Nadu, and therefore, the sales could not be considered as inter-state sales.

Final Decision: The court dismissed the tax revision cases with costs.

Judgment :-

SETHURAMAN, J.

These Tax Revision cases arises out of an order of the Tribunal dt. 7th February, 1974 in four appeals relating to the asst. yr. 1968-69 to 1971-72. The assessee is a dealer in ship's stores and is also doing business as ship chandlers. The assessee imports goods from abroad for the purpose of supplying the said goods either to foreign going vessels or to Diplomatic Personnel. The said goods, which are imported, are received in a customs bonded warehouse and at the time of placing the indent and also in the subsequent bills of lading and invoice, there was a declaration by the assessee that the goods were intended either for "re-export" as ship's stores and or for supply to Diplomatic Corps. The goods were cleared under the supervision of the Customs authorities whenever they were sold by the assessee. In the present case we are concerned with supplis made to certain ships located at that time in the Madras Harbour. The orders for supplies of the goods required by the said ships were usually received by the Captain or the Master or the Chief Steaward of the ship. The orders listed out the required supplies mentioning the description of the goods and the quantity required and stated "Please arrange to supply as the following Local-bonded Stores". There were supplies of goods like whisky, vegetables etc. In respect of the bonded goods, the assessee prepared a bill and the Customs authority checked the bill with the written order. The bill was, after verification, passed to the Asstt. Collector of Customs (Bonds) permitting the supply. The bill was then filed in the Export Department of the Customs authorities and the goods got released from the bonded warehouse. The Preventive Officer of the Customs authority, who realised the goods, escorted the transportation of the goods and the goods were then placed by the ship's Officer in a special locker provided in the ship. This was obviously to ensure that the bounded goods which had not paid any duty, did not enter into the local market. Along with the goods, the assessee sent a delivery receipt, which was got signed by an Officer of the ship in taken of receipt in goods condition.

2. The assessee claimed that the property in the goods passed only after the goods passed the Customs frontier and that the property did not pass in the territory of Tamil Nadu. It was further contended that the sales were in the course of export because they were to be one the board of the ship, which ultimately moved out of the Madras harbour. The ST Authorities did not accept the assessee's submission and held that the goods were taxable by the said authorities under the Tamil Nadu General ST Act, 1959. The appeals of the assessee to the AAC were unsuccessful. On further appeals, the Tribunal dismissed the appeals. The order of the Tribunal is the subject of the present revision proceeding.

3. The learned counsel for the revision petitioners submitted that the sales took place outside the State of were interstate sales and, therefore, are not liable to the taxed, under the Tamil Nadu General ST Act. He contended that the territorial waters do not form part of the State and for this purpose relied on certain cases decided by this Court. The learned Addl. Government Pleader submitted that the present case came squarely within the scope of the Tamil Nadu General ST Act, as the sales took place within the State. For this purpose, he relied on the provisions of S. 4(2)(b) of the Central ST Act and also the charging provision r/w S. 2(n) Explanation (3) of the Tamil Nadu General ST Act.

4. The point to be considered is whether the sale took place within the State of Madras so as to be taxable under the Tamil Nadu General ST Act. We have first to see whether the sales comes within the scope of S. 3 of the Central ST Act. If so, the State law cannot tax them. Sec. 3 of the said Act, in so far as it is material, runs as follows :

"3. A sale or purchase of goods shall be deemed to take place









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top