SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(Mad) 127

P.S.KAILASAM, N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR
P. P. Chandrasekaran – Appellant
Versus
Government of India and Others – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:S. Sivasubramaniam, Advocate.

Judgment :-

KAILASAM, J.

This petition is filed by a relation of one Mannicketh Balachandran for the issue of a writ of Habeas Corpus for production of the said Mannicketh Balachandran for being dealt with according to Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

2. Mannicketh Balachandran was an ex-naval officer in the Indian Navy. He was tried by the court-Martial at Bombay for certain offences under Section 409, Indian Penal Code read with Section 77 of the Navy Act and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 18 months on 21-8-1972. He was committed to the Central Prison, Bombay, on 22-11-1974 to undergo the sentence. He was convicted by another Court Martial on 12-3-1975 to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 6 months for offences under Sections 77(1) and 41(e) of the Navy Act. The Court ordered that the sentences should run consecutively. In all, therefore, the detenu has to serve a sentence of two years' rigorous imprisonment from 22-11-1974.

3. It is now contended by Mr. Sivasubramaniam, learned counsel for the petitioner, that as the detenu was kept

under naval custody from 10-5-1972 to 22-8-1972 and again from 7-11-1974 to 21-11-1974, this period, though it was before he was






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top