SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(Mad) 288

RISHNASWAMY REDDY
Paranjothi Udyar and Others – Appellant
Versus
State and Others – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:C. K. Venkatanarasimhan, R. Santhanam, Advocates.

Judgment :-

Cri.M.P. No. 2841 of 1974 has been filed by the petitioners, namely, accused 1 to 4, 7, 9, 10 to 14, 17, 18, 20, for transfer of S.C. No. 67 of 1974 from the file of Assistant Sessions Judge, Ramanathapuram at Devakottai to the file of any other court of competent jurisdiction within the District or at Madurai. Cr.M.P. No. 3130 of 1974 has been filed to quash the order of the committal made In P.B.C. No. 3 of 1974 on the file of the Court of Judicial Second Class Magistrate, Karaikudi.

2. I shall first take up Cr.M.P. No. 3130 of 1974. This petition has been filed by the aforesaid accused to quash the committal proceedings on the main ground that the Judicial Second Class Magistrate, Karaikudi, has not followed the procedure laid down under new Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter called 'the Code') in cases of private complaints and, therefore, the committal was illegal.

3. The facts of the case are these; One Muthana Kone, the second respondent herein, filed a private complaint before the District Magistrate, Devikottai on 5-2-1974 alleging that the petitioners herein and six others trespassed into his land at Sattanendal Patti Village on 30-1-1974 and unlawfully cut

















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top