SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(Mad) 629

SETHURAMAN, V.RAMASWAMY
Commissioner of Income Tax, Madras-Ii – Appellant
Versus
V. G. Panneerdas and Company – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:J. Jayaraman, T. S. Ramu, Advocates.

Judgment :-

RAMASWAMI J.

The following four questions are referred under section 256 of the Income-tax :

"1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was right in holding that the penalty of Rs.12, 200 levied under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for the assessment year 1961-62 is illegal ?

2. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was right in holding that the penalty of Rs. 6, 404 levied under section 271(1)(c) for the assessment year 1959-60 is illegal ?

3. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was right in law in holding that the penalty of Rs. 8, 700 levied under section 271(1)(c) for the assessment year 1960-61 is illegal ?

4. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was right in law in holding that the penalty of Rs. 6, 300 levied under section 271(1)(c) for the assessment year 1961-62 is illegal ?

one of the assessees is a firm of partnership and the other is a partner in the partnership. The assessment year in question in respect of the firm is 1961-62 and that for the individual partner are 19



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top