SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(Mad) 180

V.RAMASWAMY, SETHURAMAN
State of Tamil Nadu – Appellant
Versus
Gemini Studios – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:K. Venkataswami, C. Natarajan, Advocates.

Judgment :-

RAMASWAMI, J.

This revision petition is filed against the order of the Tribunal setting aside the penalty levied under section 10(b) read with section 10A of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. The respondents are dealers registered under the Central Sales Tax Act. They are film producers and processors of cinema films. They purchased an Otis lift for Rs. 20, 630 on 30th September, 1960, by issuing C forms. On the ground that the registration certificate issued under the Central Sales Tax Act did not authorise the purchase of Otis lift by issue of C forms, the Joint Commercial Tax Officer, T. Nagar Division, initiated proceedings under section 10(b) read with section 10A of the Act. The respondents replied by their letter dated 9th May, 1967, that Otis lift purchased by them would come either within the class of articles mentioned in category (b) of the certificate of registration or under category (c) as accessories of plant and machinery necessary to execute the contracts for studio hire. In support of their contention that the lift was indispensable for the manufacturing process carried on in their premises and, therefore, it would come within the class of goods mentione






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top