SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1974 Supreme(Mad) 192

High Court of Judicature at Madras
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VARADARAJAN
State Bank of India - Appellant
Versus
State Bank of India Staff - Respondent
Case No : Writ Petitions Nos. 1006 to 1008 of 1971 and 2827 and 2828 of 1972
Decided On : 26 April 1974

Advocates Appeared: For

The normal working hours in an establishment are fixed by the management, subject to the provisions of the Shops and Establishments Act. Overtime work is work done beyond the normal working hours and is entitled to be paid at twice the ordinary rate of wages.

Headnote:

SHOPS AND ESTABLISHMENTS ACT - S. 31 - OVERTIME WAGES - COMPUTATION - CALCULATION OF WAGE PERIOD - EXCLUSION OF FESTIVAL HOLIDAYS - JURISDICTION OF LABOUR COURT - S. 33C(2) OF THE INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES ACT, 1947.

Fact of the Case:

The workmen claimed overtime wages at twice the ordinary rate for work done beyond 6 1/2 hours per day on week days and 4 hours on Saturdays from 1-6-1963. The management contended that the expression "overtime work" in S.31 of the Shops and Establishments Act should be construed to mean work done beyond the working hours prescribed under S.14 of that Act. The Labour Court found that the normal working hours in the establishment of the management are 6 1/2 hours per day from Monday to Friday and 4 hours on Saturday and that any work done on those days in excess of those hours would be overtime work.

Finding of the Court:

The Labour Court held that the workmen are entitled to claim overtime wages at twice the ordinary rate for work done beyond 6 1/2 hours per day on week days and 4 hours on Saturday and computed the money value of the benefit at Rs. 219.85, Rs. 216.37 and Rs. 275.29 in C.P. Nos. 19, 20 and 21 of 1964 respectively.

Issues: 1. Whether the expression "overtime work" in S.31 of the Shops and Establishments Act should be construed to mean work done beyond the working hours prescribed under S.14 of that Act? 2. Whether the workmen are entitled to claim overtime wages at twice the ordinary rate for work done beyond 6 1/2 hours per day on week days and 4 hours on Saturday?

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The expression "overtime work" in S.31 of the Shops and Establishments Act should not be construed to mean work done beyond the working hours prescribed under S.14 of that Act. 2. The workmen are entitled to claim overtime wages at twice the ordinary rate for work done beyond 6 1/2 hours per day on week days and 4 hours on Saturday.

Final Decision: The writ petitions are dismissed with costs of the first respondent in each of the petitions.

Judgment :-

Varadarajan, J.

There is an observation of a Division Bench of this Court in Railway Employees' Co-operative Bank v. Labour Court, that it was not the case of the workman that he had worked for more than 48 hours and, therefore, was entitled to overtime wages under S.31 of the Tamil Nadu Shops and Establishments Act, 1947. Another Division Bench of this Court has observed in K. P. V. Sheik Mohammed Rowther & Co. v. K. S. Narayanan,:

"So far as the overtime wages are concerned, the learned Judge has found that the workman in W.A. No. 402 of 1960 has worked beyond the normal working hours. That finding appears to be correct. In view of it, he will be entitled to overtime wages" *

.

K. N. Mudaliyar, J., before whom these writ petitions came, felt that there was conflict in the reasoning in these two Division Bench decisions and that the matter must, therefore, go before a Division Bench. That is how the matter has come up before this Bench.

2. Selvaraj Daniel, Parangusam and Damodaran, who are respectively the first respondent in W.P. Nos. 1006 to 1008 of 1971, filed Claim Petitions Nos. 19, 21 and 20 of 1964 under S. 33C-2 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The petitioners in those petitions (hereinafter referred to as the workmen) claimed to be employees in the commercial establishment of the petitioner in these petitions (hereinafter referred to as the management) and to be governed by the Tamil Nadu Shops and Establishments Act, 1047. The workmen alleged that the State Government has, by a notification dated 16-1-1961 made under S.6 of the Tamil Nadu Shops and Establishments Act, exempted the management's branches in this State from the operation of the provisions of that Act except Ss. 31, 41, 43, 50 and 51. Section 31 provides that where any person employed in any establishment is required to work overtime, he shall be entitled, in respect of such overtime work, to wages at twice the ordinary rate of wages. "Overtime work" which is not defined in that Act, in the ordinary sense, means work done beyond the normal working hours in force in the establishment either by contract, settlement or award. Under paragraph 10.46(1) of the Desai Award, working hours for members other than subordinate staff of the various bank exclusive of the recess period on week days are fixed at 6 1/2 hours a day. That provision is not compulsory, but enables the employer to fix the working hours as not exceeding 6 1/2 hours a day on all week days except Saturday, on which it may not be exceeding 4 hours. Paragraph 10.46(14) of that Award provides for the rate of payment for overtime work and says that where payment is required to be made by any enactment at a higher rate, it shall be paid at such higher rate, and sub-cl. (17) of that paragraph states that the directions given in paragraph 10.46 shall be subject to the provisions made by any enactment applicable to the establishment concerned. The workmen understand that as per the practice prevailing in the management's establishment, since 1-4-1948, any employee working beyond the normal working hours, namely, 6 1/2 hours per day on week days and 4 hours on Saturdays was paid overtime wages at twice the rate of ordinary wages. That was the practice until the Desai Award came into force even after the earlier Sastri Award had stated that overtime wages shall be paid at 1 1/2 times the ordinary rate. But the management is paying over-time wages only at 1/2 times the ordinary rate after the Desai Award was made applicable to the establishment of the management form 1-6-1963, apparently under the impression that the rate of overtime wages prescribed in S.31 of the Shops and Establishments Act would apply only to overtime work done beyond 8 hours per day. The workmen are entitled to wages at twice the ordinary rate even for overtime work done beyond 6 1/2 hours and within 8 hours on week days and beyond 4 hours on Saturdays under paragraph 10.46(1), (14) and (17) of the Desai Award read with

























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top