V.RAMASWAMY, RAMANUJAM
Union Traders – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Commercial Tax Officer – Respondent
RAMANUJAM, J.
All the above Writ Petitions have been filed by the same assessee but in relation to different asst. yr. 1969-70, 1970-71 and 1971-72. For all the said assessment years, the petitioners has been assessed on their sales of car seat covers at the rate of 13 per cent treating the sales as coming under item 3 of the First Schedule to the Tamil Nadu General ST Act, 1959. The assessee had contended before the assessing authority that the rate of tax on sales of car seat covers should be at 3/1/2 multi-point and not at the rate of 13 per cent single point. According to the petitioner, the car seat covers cannot be treated as automobile accessories and brought in for charge under item 38 of the First Schedule to the Tamil Nadu General ST Act. The assessing Officer, however, rejected the said contention. The petitioner thereafter filed appeals and two of the appeals relating to the asst. yr. 1969-70 and 1971-72 have been disposed of by the AAC holding that the car seat covers are liable to be taxed a automobile accessories. The petitioner has thereafter filed appeals to the Tribunal in relation to those assessment years. As regards the assessment for 1970-71 the app
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.