SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1974 Supreme(Mad) 505

VARADARAJAN
Nathan – Appellant
Versus
Vaithinathan and Others – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:R. Balsubramanian, T. S. Arunachalam, Advocates.

Judgment :-

The petitioner herein filed a private complaint on 22-9-1974 in the Court of the Judicial Second Class Magistrate, Vridhachalam against the respondents for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 447, 324 and 307 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code alleging that the nine respondents committed the various offences during the luncheon interval on 5-9-1974 in the premises of the petitioner. There is an allegation in the complaint that at 2 p.m. on the same day a complaint was given taken. It is stated that the petitioner himself had been arrested on 5-9-1974 when he went to the police station, evidently on the complaint given to the police by some or all of the respondents and was released on bail only on 18-9-1974. Subsequently, he presented a private complaint on 22-9-1974 as stated above. The learned Judicial Second Class Magistrate forwarded the complaint to Vridhachalam police for investigation and report, under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. On the next day, the petitioner filed Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 898 of 1974 before the Magistrate questioning the competency of the Magistrate to send the complaint to the police



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top