SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1973 Supreme(Mad) 41

G.RAMANUJAM, V.RAMASWAMY
Khemchand Rajkumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:B. Rajagopalan, K. Venkataswami, P. Venkataraman, Advocates.

Judgment :-

RAMANUJAM, J.

This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the suo motu order passed by the Board of Revenue levying for the first time a penalty of Rs. 22, 665, which, according to the Board of Revenue, the assessing officer should have levied under section 12(3) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, while making the assessment. In the proceedings for assessment, the assessee's account books were rejected on the basis of certain anamath books recovered from the assessee's place of business and a best judgment assessment was made. The said best judgment assessment resulted in an addition of a sum of Rs. 7, 60, 500 to the turnover of Rs. 9, 99, 449.46 returned by the assessee. At the time of making the best judgment assessment under section 12(2), the assessing authority had not passed any order under section 12(3). Even in the appeal filed before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner by the assessee, the Appellate Assistant Commissioner did not consider the question of penalty leviable under section 12(3). After the appellate authority passed the order granting a relief on a turnover of Rs. 5, 000, the Board of Revenue, in exercise of its suo motu powers, called for


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top