High Court of Judicature at Madras
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASWAMY & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G. RAMANUJAM
Commissioner of Income Tax, Madras - Appellant
Versus
Indian Steel Rolling Mills Limited - Respondent
Case No : No
Decided On : 04 May 1973
SUPER PROFITS TAX ACT, 1963 - S. 2(9), 4, 19(1) - SECOND SCHEDULE, RULE 1 - CAPITAL OF A COMPANY - RESERVES - MEANING - GRATUITY FUND - EXCESS PROVISION FOR TAXATION - WHETHER RESERVES - HELD, YES.
Fact of the Case:
The assessee, a public limited company, included in its capital base for the purpose of ascertaining the amount of standard deduction under the Super Profits Tax Act, 1963, the sum of Rs. 2,32,595 representing the provision for gratuity and Rs. 6,150 being the excess provision for tax. The Super Profits Tax Officer and the Appellate Assistant Commissioner rejected the claim. On further appeal, the Tribunal held that the assessee was entitled to treat the sum of Rs. 2,32,595 representing the provision for gratuity as a reserve and also the excess provision for taxation to the extent of Rs. 6,150 would also be a reserve.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the amounts set apart for payment of gratuity, a contingent and future liability and which have been used for the purpose of the business of the company, should be treated as a reserve. The court also held that the sum of Rs. 6, 150 which is an excess provision for taxation and which was available for use by the company in its business has rightly been treated as a "reserve".
Issues: Whether the sum of Rs. 2,32,595 represented reserves as contemplated under rule 1 of the Second Schedule to the Super Profits Tax Act, 1963?
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the term "reserve" in rule 1 of the Second Schedule to the Super Profits Tax Act, 1963, means a specified amount set apart for a specific purpose by a company, before distribution of dividends, which is available for future use of the company.
Final Decision: Both the questions are, therefore, answered in favour of the assessee.
RAMANUJAM J.
The assessee is a public limited company. Its accounts for the year ending on 31st March, 1962, relevant for the assessment year 1962-63, were considered by the board of directors on 19th July, 1962. The profit in that year amounted to Rs. 12, 39, 139. After making certain provisions towards tax, gratuity, etc., there was a balance of Rs. 5, 88, 365. The board of directors recommended the following appropriations Rs
Transfer to development rebate reserve : 55, 000
Proposed dividend
Preference 35, 746
Ordinary 4, 87, 858
5, 78, 604
This left a balance of Rs. 9, 760. The provisions made towards tax liability and actual payments of tax were as under
Rs
Provision as on 1-4-1961 4, 00, 000
Provision made during the year, 4, 30, 000
---------------- 8, 30, 000 ----------------- Less : Advance tax for 1962-63 1, 08, 507
Provisional tax paid for 1961-62 3, 93, 851
5, 02, 358
The provision for taxation as on March 31, 1961, was Rs. 2, 91, 493 as against the actual tax liability for 1961-62 of Rs. 2, 85, 343 leaving a surplus of Rs. 6, 150. The appropriations towards gratuity were as under
Rs
Provision for gratuity as on 1-4-1961 2, 20, 181
Addition during the year 22, 178
2, 42, 359
Less : Payments during the year 9, 765
2, 32, 594
In working out the capital base for the purpose of ascertaining the amount of standard deduction under the Super Profits Tax Act, 1963, the assessee included the following sums apart from the capital of Rs. 53, 82, 682
Rs. Development rebate reserve 1, 30, 950
General reserves 33, 104
Repairs and renewal reserve 1, 55, 174
Balance in the profit and loss account 9, 761
Provision for taxation 3, 27, 643
Proposed dividend 5, 23, 604
Reserve for gratuity 2, 32, 595
The Super Profits Tax Officer considered the development rebate reserve and the general reserve as capital and rejected the claim in respect of the other items for the reason that they were merely provisions for specific liabilities and would not constitute reserves under rule 1 of the Second Schedule to the Super Profits Tax Act, 1963The assessee appealed to the Appellate Assistant Commissioner. He held that the sum of Rs. 1, 55, 174 representing the reserve for repairs and renewals should be regarded as reserve and included it in the computation of capital. He, however, agreed with the Super Profits Tax Officer in respect of the other items
On further appeal to the Tribunal, it held that the assessee was entitled to treat the sum of Rs. 2, 32, 595 representing the provision for gratuity as a reserve. It also held that the excess provision for taxation in 1961-62 to the extent of Rs. 6, 150 would also be a reserve
At the instance of the revenue, the following questions have been referred to this court under section 19(1) of the Super Profits Tax Act, 1963
1.
"Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the sum of Rs. 2, 32, 595 represented reserves as contemplated under rule 1 of the Second Schedule to the Super Profits Tax Act, 1963 ?
2. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the sum of Rs. 6, 150 was not part of reserve under rule 1 of the Second Schedule to the Super Profits Tax Act, 1963 ?" *
It is necessary at this stage to refer to the relevant provisions of the Super Profits Tax Act, 1963. Section 4 levies a tax called "super profits tax" on every company for every assessment year commencing on and from 1st day of April, 1963, in respect of so much of its chargeable profits of the previous year as exceed the standard deduction at the rate or rates specified in the Third Schedule. Section 2(5) defines "chargeable profits" as the total income of an assessee computed under the Income-tax Act, 1961, for any previous year and adjusted in accordance with the provisions of the First Schedule. Section 2(9) defines "standard deduction" as meaning an amount equal to 6% of the capital of the company as computed in accordance with the provisions of the Second Schedule or an amount of Rs. 50, 000, whichever is greater. Schedule
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.