SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1973 Supreme(Mad) 382

G.RAMANUJAM, V.RAMASWAMY
State of Madras – Appellant
Versus
Trustees of The Port of Madras – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:K. Venkataswami, R. G. Rajan, D. V. Sivagnanam, Advocates.

Judgment :-

RAMANUJAM, J.

These two cases relate to the same assessee and involve the same point. The assessee is the Madras Port Trust represented by its Chairman. The assessee was periodically effecting sales through M/s. Murray and Company, Auctioneers, of unclaimed and unserviceable articles. For the assessment years 1964-65 and 1965-66, it has effected sales of such articles to the extent of Rs. 8, 20, 312.88 and Rs. 9, 76, 058.25 respectively. The assessing authority took the view that the sales of such articles effected by the assessee are taxable. In that view, it determined the taxable turnover of the assessee for the years 1964-65 and 1965-66 at Rs. 8, 06, 627.88 and Rs. 9, 62, 012.25 respectively after rejecting the contention of the assessee that such sales are not in the course of carrying on of a business activity as contemplated by the provisions of the Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1959 (hereinafter called as the Act.)

The assessee thereafter appealed to the Appellate Assistant Commissioner, but without success. On further appeals to the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, the Tribunal held that the assessee is neither a dealer as defined in the Act nor does it carry on any








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top