SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1968 Supreme(Mad) 35

VEERASWAMI, RAMAPRASADA RAO
Rajah D. V. Appa Rao Bahadur – Appellant
Versus
First Wealth Tax Officer, City Circle Ii, Madras – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: For

Judgment :-

VEERASWAMI J.

These petitions for certiorari and prohibition raise a question of the constitutional vires of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, in so far as it imposes an annual tax in respect of the net wealth, particularly buildings. A further question to be considered is whether the Act violates article 19(1)(f) of the Constitution of India. The petitioner is an ex-land holder of the Jaggampeta "A" and "D" Estates in the East Godavari District but is now a permanent resident of Madras. He owns, as he, says, immovable properties consisting of one compact block of buildings in Mylapore and Royapettah High Road worth Rs. 8, 70, 505, movable properties in the form of capital in a certain producing concern of the value of Rs. 58, 458.79, National Savings Certificates and shares of Rs. 79, 700 and bank deposits amounting to Rs. 5, 012.19 and owes unsecured loans of Rs. 26, 800 and non-business debts of Rs. 45, 792.31. For the assessment year 1960-61, he apparently filed on January 25, 1961, a return disclosing total assets valued at Rs. 9, 43, 582.07 as on the valuation date which included Rs. 8, 70, 505 being the value of the buildings. On November 3, 1961, an assessment order was






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top