SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1968 Supreme(Mad) 429

RAMAPRASADA RAO, K.VEERASWAMI
Controller of Estate Duty, Madras – Appellant
Versus
C. R. Ramchandra Gounder – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:V. Balasubrahmanyan, K. R. Ramamani, Advocates.

Judgment :-

VEERASWAMI J.

In the first of these reference arising out of the Tribunal's order, the question substantially is whether the property in Avinasi Road, Coimbatore, as well as a sum of Rs. 1 lakh passed at the death of one C. S. Ramiah Gounder on May 5, 1957, and, as such, are dutiable under the provisions of the Estate Duty Act, 1953. He was a partner of a firm, called N. Desai Gounder & Co. at Coimbatore, and the property was in the occupation of the firm as a tenant. In August, 1953, by a registered documents, he settled the property absolutely and irrevocably on his two sons, C. R. Lingiah and C. R. Krishnan. Even thereafter the firm continued to be in the occupation of the premises, but the rents accruing were thenceforward credited in equal shares to the relative accounts of the donees in its books. The partnership came to an end on April 30, 1957. On March 30, 1953, long before its dissolution, the firm was asked by Ramiah Gounder to transfer from his loan account with it a sum of Rs. 1 lakh to the credit of each his 5 sons in equal shares of Rs. 20, 000 by opening separate accounts in their individual names in the firm's books. The Tribunal, differing from the reve








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top