SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(Mad) 217

RAMAPRASADA RAO, VEERASWAMI
Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Madurai Division, Madurai – Appellant
Versus
Ravi Auto Stores – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:K. Venkataswami, Mrs. S. Jayalakshmi Shanmughavel, Advocates.

Judgment :-

VEERASWAMI, J.

The question in this case is whether welding electrodes are electrical goods to attract entry 41 of Schedule I to the Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1959. The Tribunal has taken the view that they are not. Its reasoning is that in the instant case welding electrodes are not themselves used with electrical energy. This is with reference to the language employed by entry 41 which is :

"All electrical goods, instruments, apparatus, appliances and all such articles, the use of which cannot be had except with the application of electrical energy, including fans, lighting bulbs, electrical earthenwares and porcelain and all other accessories and component parts either sold as a whole or in parts." *

The aspect of the entry relating to the use of the article with electricity only was introduced for the first time in 1959. Prior to that, section 3(2)(v), the predecessor of the present entry 41, was :

"All electrical goods, instruments, apparatus and appliances, including fans, and lighting bulbs, electrical earthenware and porcelain and all other accessories." *

Articles which fell within entry 41 are taxable at the point of first sale in the State at six per cent.

It

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top