SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(Mad) 178

RAMAKRISHNAN, SRINIVASAN
Mahendra Kumar Ishwarlal and Company – Appellant
Versus
State of Madras – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:K. Rajah Iyer, K. Chandramouli, T.S. Vishwanatha, Advocates.

Judgment :-

RAMAKRISHNAN, J.

This revision case is filed against the order of the Madras Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal in T.A. No. 21 of 1963 by the petitioners who are the assessees. The petitioners are Mahendra Kumar Ishwarlal and Company, jaggery and foodgrains merchants at Tirupathur. The petitioners constitute a firm comprising of four partners, with shares noted against each as below :

1. Chunilal Bhagavandas ... Re. 0-2-0 2. Ranchoddas Ramdas ... Re. 0-2-0 3. Mahendra Kumar Chunilal ... Re. 0-6-0 4. Ishwarlal Ranchoddas ... Re. 0-6-0

It may be mentioned that No. 3 is the son of No. 1 and No. 4 is the son of No. 2. There is a Bombay firm known as "Chunilal Bhagavandas and Company", comprising of the same partners, but with this difference, namely, that the share of each of the aforesaid partners is 4 annas.

In the year of assessment, the Tirupathur firm claims to have transferred to the Bombay firm jaggery which has been valued at Rs. 4, 40, 675.87 nP. It is with this part of the transactions that we are concerned in this revision case. The department took the view that this transfer of jaggery of the aforesaid value represented a sale by the Tirupathur firm to the Bombay firm and






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top