SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(Mad) 127

SRINIVASAN, VENKATADRI
C. T. Narayanan Chettiar – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Income Tax, Madras – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: For

Judgment :-

SRINIVASAN J.

The assessee is a Hindu undivided family carrying on a money-lending business at Madras and at Muar in the Federated Malay States. Through its karta, the assessee was a partner in a firm, each of the partners of which had, under the terms of the partnership deed, to contribute a capital of Rs. 10, 000. The partnership deed further provided that the partners could advance moneys to the partnership to the extent necessary, which was to bear interest at 6 per cent. per annum. The money-lending business at Muar was remitting moneys from time to time by bank drafts. These drafts were endorsed in favour of the partnership firm, and the amounts were credited to the loan account of the assessee. These were treated as advances to the partnership. In respect of these advances the partnership firm paid interest, and this quantum of interest was taxed as income from the money-lending business of the assessee in the earlier assessment years The assessee had another account, a current account, with the firm. In this account were recorded amounts borrowed by the assessee. The firm, in its turn, charged interest on such borrowals, and the payment of this interest by the as
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top