SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(Mad) 288

High Court of Judicature at Madras
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K S RAMAMURTI & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMAKRISHNAN
Zackria Sons Private Limited - Appellant
Versus
State of Madras - Respondent
Case No : Tax Case No. 86 of 1963
Decided On : 28 July 1964

Advocates Appeared:C. S. Chandrasekhara Sastri, G. Ramanujam, Advocates.

Judgment :-

RAMAKRISHNAN, J.

This revision case is directed against the order of the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras, in T.A. No. 1449 of 1961. The assessee is Messrs Zackria Sons Private Limited, Government and Public Auctioneers in Madras. They were engaged by the authorities of the Women's Christian College, Madras, to auction the superstructure of a building belonging to the college called "Riverlands Bungalow". The terms of the agreement are found in the conditions of sale announced by the auctioneers and we will presently refer to them. The auction was held on 1st November, 1959, and the highest bidder was Madar Sahib for Rs. 18, 500. A bill was issued to the auction purchaser for the amount less the advance deposited on the date of auction and the auctioneers received the amount from the bidder in full. The department assessed the auctioneers on the abovesaid bid price as representing a sale and regarding the auctioneers as "dealers". The appeal to the Appellate Assistant Commissioner and the further appeal to the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal were rejected and they have come to this Court in revision.

The main terms of the agreement between the assessee, the firm of auctioneers, and the principal, viz., the authorities of the Women's Christian College, can be spelt out from the conditions of the auction sale, as well as from the correspondence. On 13th October, 1959, the Bursar of the College wrote to Messrs Zackria Sons Private Limited asking them to arrange to hold the auction sale on Sunday, the 1st November, 1959, at 10-30 A.M. at the site. The building was to be kept open for the inspection on the previous Friday between 10 A.M. and 6 P.M. Further instructions relating to the auction sale were to be had from the architects, engaged by the College, Messrs Prynne, Abbott & Davis, Madras. The auction was to be in one lot to the highest bidder and the Bursar agreed to pay the auctioneers 5 per cent. commission and all advertisement expenses in connection with the sale. The auctioneers were requested to commence advertising as soon as possible. On 17th October, 1959, the auctioneers wrote to Messrs Prynne, Abbott & Davis stating that they had issued the advertisement and sent a draft of the hand-bill for approval. On 21st October, 1959. Messrs Prynne, Abbott & Davis returned the draft auction notice with a few corrections and directed the auctioneers to hold the auction in accordance with the instructions of the Bursar of the College.Now we come to the notice of the auction sale. It contains the following special conditions :

(1) Intending bidders should clearly understand that only the superstructure of "Riverlands Bungalow"..... for the purpose of demolition and removal of the materials is now offered for sale;

(2) The highest bid received at the auction will be taken subject to acceptance and confirmation by the architects, Messrs Prynne, Abbott & Davis, who will communicate acceptance or rejection of the highest offer received at the auction on the spot;

(3) The highest bidder shall immediately after his being declared the highest bid pay a deposit of 25 per cent. of the amount of his bid, and the bid shall be considered only on such deposit being made;

(4) Immediately after the highest bidder has been declared the purchaser he shall pay the balance of the purchase price within three days from the date of the auction sale; and

(5) Sales tax will have to be paid by the purchaser.

We have next the bid list for the auction held on 1st November, 1959. It records the successive bids ending with that of Madar Sahib, who made the highest bid and there is the signature of Madar Sahib. The bid is confirmed and witnessed by one R. Kiffin Peterson, Architect. Kiffin Peterson is the person who entered into prior correspondence on behalf of Messrs Prynne, Abbott & Davis. He is therefore the representative of the firm which in turn represented the authorities of the College, at the auction. The bill to Madar Sahib, the highest bidde












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top