SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1963 Supreme(Mad) 114

JAGADISAN, SRINIVASAN
Erode Yarn Stores – Appellant
Versus
State of Madras – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:C. S. Chandrasekhara Sastry, G. Ramanujam, Advocates.

Judgment :-

SRINIVASAN, J.

In suo motu revision proceedings under section 34 of the Madras General Sales Tax Act, the Board of Revenue called for and examined the original order of assessment made upon the petitioners and took the view that the assessing authority had failed to bring to tax the value of the packing materials which was included in the sales turnover of cotton yarn. It also thought that a certain part of the turnover of the cotton yarn had been wrongly exempted as second sales. In response to a notice issued by the Board of Revenue proposing to revise the assessment and to re-fix the turnover, the petitioners-assessees objected on the ground that as an appeal had been filed before the Tribunal the Board was not competent to take proceedings under section 34. Other objections to the assessability of the turnovers in question were also advanced. The Board held that the assessees had not filed an appeal to the Tribunal and that therefore the Board was not prevented from taking action under section 34. It also revised the turnover as proposed.

It is against these orders that the present appeal has been filed.

Mr. Chandrasekhara Sastry, for the petitioners principally rested











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top