SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(Mad) 79

High Court of Judicature at Madras
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMACHANDRA IYER & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SRINIVASAN
Indira Bai and Another - Appellant
Versus
Gift Tax Officer, City Circle Ii, Madras - Respondent
Case No : No
Decided On : 20 March 1961

Advocates Appeared: For

The Gift-tax Act, 1958, levies tax on the totality of gifts made by a person during the previous year, and the exemptions under sections 5(1) and 5(2) apply to the aggregate value of gifts, not to each individual gift.

Headnote:

GIFT TAX - CHARGE - AGGREGATION OF GIFTS - EXEMPTIONS - INTERPRETATION OF SECTIONS 3, 5(1), 5(2) - GIFT TAX ACT, 1958.

Fact of the Case:

Petitioners challenged the validity of the Gift-tax Officer's notice requiring them to submit a return aggregating all gifts made during the previous year and the assessment order aggregating gifts and applying exemptions only to the aggregate value. Petitioners contended that the Act requires aggregation of gifts only for determining the applicable tax rate, and that each gift is eligible for the exemption limits under sections 5(1) and 5(2).

Finding of the Court:

The Court held that the Gift-tax Act, 1958, levies tax on the totality of gifts made by a person during the previous year, and that the exemptions under sections 5(1) and 5(2) apply to the aggregate value of gifts, not to each individual gift. The Court found that the charging section, section 3, and the exemption provisions, sections 5(1) and 5(2), all refer to "gifts made during the previous year," indicating that the totality of gifts is the relevant factor for both the charge and the exemptions.

Issues: 1. Whether the Gift-tax Act, 1958, requires aggregation of gifts only for determining the applicable tax rate, or whether it also requires aggregation for the purpose of applying exemptions. 2. Whether each gift is eligible for the exemption limits under sections 5(1) and 5(2) of the Act.

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The Court interpreted the Gift-tax Act, 1958, as a whole, considering the charging section, section 3, the exemption provisions, sections 5(1) and 5(2), and the Schedule. The Court found that the Act consistently refers to "gifts made during the previous year," indicating that the totality of gifts is the relevant factor for both the charge and the exemptions. 2. The Court rejected the petitioners' argument that the reference to the previous year in section 3 or section 5 is only for the purpose of convenience of assessment to tax and that it has no relevance to the question of aggregating the gifts made during such previous year. The Court held that the phrase "gifts, if any, made during the previous year" cannot be split into separate parts for the purpose of serving the mode of interpretation sought by the petitioners.

Final Decision: Both writ petitions were dismissed with costs.

Judgment :-

SRINIVASAN J.

In W. P. No. 957 of 1958, the petitioner seeks the issue of a writ of prohibition prohibiting the Gift-tax Officer from enforcing a notice calling upon the petitioner to submit the prescribed return under the Act. In W.P. No 217 of 1960, the petitioner prays for the issue of a writ of certiorari or other appropriate writ for quashing an order of assessment made by the Gift-tax Officer. Since the same question of the proper construction of the provisions of the Act is raised in the two petitions, they are dealt with together. The facts relating to each case are however different and they will be set out briefly The petitioner in the first of these writs had made five gifts, four of which were of either Rs. 10, 000 or below and one of Rs. 20, 000. By a notice dated October 30, 1958, the Gift-tax Officer called upon the petitioner to submit a return for the assessment year 1958-59. In the form of return which was enclosed to the notice, the petitioner was required to aggregate the value of the taxable gifts made during the account year relating to the assessment year 1958-59. The petitioner's contention is that under the charging provisions of the Act, the tax is payable on each gift subject to the exceptions and exemptions provided in the Act and that there is no provision in the Act for aggregating the value of all gifts made by a person during the previous year. It is claimed that rule 3 of the Gift-tax Rules of 1958 framed by the Central Board of Revenue in exercise of the powers conferred by section 46 of the Act travels beyond the provisions of the Act, in seeking to aggregate all the gifts made during the previous year and in levying tax on the basis of such aggregation. According to the petitioner, only the gift of Rs. 20, 000, is taxable to the extent it exceeds the maximum laid down in section 5(2) of the Act. The proceedings of the Gift-tax Officer calling for the return in the manner stated above are attacked as beyond jurisdictionIn W. P. No. 217 of 1960, the validity of the assessment order for the assessment year 1958-59 is in question. The petitioner therein had made gifts to a total of Rs. 65, 250 in favour of his sons in the relevant account year. From the counter affidavit filed by the department, it appears that in favour of each of his four sons, the petitioner had made two gifts. Of these eight gifts made on various dates during the previous year, four are each below Rs. 10, 000 ; the remaining are each either Rs. 10, 000 or above. The petitioner contended before the Gift-tax Officer that the gifts were not liable to tax under section 5(1)(xii) as they had been made for the purpose of education of the sons. The Gift-tax Officer refused to accept the claim that the whole of the amounts so gifted could be taken out of the operation of the Act as reasonable expenses for the education of the children. He allowed only an estimated sum of Rs. 1, 000 each. The petitioner made the further claim that the gifts should not be aggregated and that section 5(2) of the Act could be so applied as to exempt any gift which was not more than Rs. 10, 000 in value. This contention was also rejected and an assessment was made on the total value of the taxable gifts fixed at Rs. 51, 250. It will be noticed that in arriving at this figure, the Gift-tax Officer allowed a sum of Rs. 10, 000 as exemption under section 5(2) of the Act as well as a sum of Rs. 1, 000 for each of the sons under section 5(2)(xii) of the Act. It may be mentioned that in the course of the hearing of the petition, the finding of the Gift-tax Officer that in so far as section 5(1)(xii) was concerned, the allowance of Rs. 1, 000 was the reasonable expense for the education of each son, was not challenged. The petitioner only attacked the validity of the aggregation of the gifts, contending that such an aggregation is not permitted by any of the provisions of the ActThe Gift-tax Act of 1958 is styled as " an Act to provide for the levy o













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top