SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(Mad) 253

JAGADISAN, SRINIVASAN
Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes – Appellant
Versus
Caltex (India) Limited, Madras – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:G. Ramanujam, King Partridge, C. S. Padmanabhan, Advocates.

Judgment :-

SRINIVASAN, J.

In T.C. No. 151 of 1959, the Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes is the petitioner. The turnover in dispute relates to a sum of Rs. 53, 874-4-0 relevant to the assessment year 1955-56. In T.C. No. 23 of 1960 also the Deputy Commissioner is the petitioner and the disputed turnover is a sum of Rs. 1, 04, 296-7-0 relevant to the assessment year 1956-57. In both these cases, the assessee is Messrs Caltex India Ltd., and the turnovers represent sales of customs bonded stocks of bunker or fuel oil.

In T.C. No. 160 of 1959, the State is the petitioner and the assessee is Messrs Burmah Shell. The assessment relates to the year 1952-53 and the turnover of Rs. 4, 35, 381 in dispute is in respect of furnace oil sold by the assessee to ocean-going vessels out of customs bonded stocks.

It will be seen accordingly that in three cases the State is the petitioner, and the dispute relates to the assessability of transactions of sale of fuel oil sold to ocean-going vessels out of what is technically known as customs bonded stocks. In these cases, the Tribunal held that the goods had not crossed the customs frontier in the course of their import into the country, that they















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top