SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(Mad) 341

VEERASWAMI
Lakshmi Mills Company, Limited, Pappanaickenpalayam – Appellant
Versus
Labour Court, Coimbatore, and Another – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: For

Judgment :-

On the application of respondent 2 under S. 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, the labour court, Coimbatore, found that he was a fitter from January 1956, among the staff of the petitioner, and that, as such, he was entitled to salary on the scales Rs. 44-11-0 to Rs. 64-11-0 and to his first increment on 1 October 1958, and computed his total benefit upto 30 September 1959 at Rs. 316-8-0. This petition by the management under Art. 226 of the Constitution to quash that order. The main contention of the petitioner, which appears to be one of its objections before the labour court but the not particularly decided by that Court, is that the question, whether respondent 2 was a fitter, as claimed by him or only a fitter-helper, as the management would have it, was not within the purview of the application under S. 33C(2) of the Act. Apparently, the labour court proceeded on the view it had jurisdiction to decide the issue

The respondent 2 was entertained by the petitioner, which is a textile mill at Coimbatore, as a temporary worker on 17 January 1954, and was made permanent from 1 January 1956 in the mechanical shop department. Before that time he was in the lowest




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top