SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(Mad) 356

JAGADISAN, SRINIVASAN
Deputy Commissioner (Commercial Taxes), Coimbatore Division, Coimbatore – Appellant
Versus
Parekutti Hajee Sons – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:G. Ramanujam, P. Sharfuddin, Advocates.

Judgment :-

SRINIVASAN, J.

Out of the turnover of Rs. 53, 742 returned by the assessee-respondent, Rs. 34, 560 was covered by C Forms. The balance of the turnover was not covered by C Forms and the assessing authority, the Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, accordingly assessed this latter part of the turnover at seven per cent. under the Central Sales Tax Act. An appeal was taken by the assessee to the Appellate Assistant Commissioner, before whom the assessee admitted that the C Forms relevant to the turnover of Rs. 19, 000 and odd assessed at seven per cent. had been received only after the final assessment was over. The final assessment by the Deputy Commercial Tax Officer in this case was on 15th June, 1960, and the relevant forms were produced before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner on 27th July, 1960. No explanation was given before the appellate authority for failure to produce these C Forms earlier. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner therefore took the view that the transactions covered by this turnover of Rs. 19, 000 and odd had to be treated as sales made to unregistered dealers and confirmed the levy of tax on this turnover at seven per cent.

On further appeal to the Tr














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top