SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1959 Supreme(Mad) 206

RAJAGOPALA IYENGAR, RAMACHANDRA.IYER
Dhanalakshmi Mills Limited – Appellant
Versus
State of Madras – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:S. Swaminathan, K. Ramagopal, Advocates.

Judgment :-

RAJAGOPALAN, J.

The assessee is a spinning mill at Tirupur. It was assessed to sales tax in the assessment year 1951-52 on its purchases of cotton for spinning under rule 4-A(iv) of the (Turnover and Assessment) Rules, which prescribed the single point for the levy of sales tax on tractions in cotton required by section 5(ii) of the Sales Tax Act. The relevant portion of rule 4-A(iv) as it then stood ran :

"4-A. Subject to the provisions of section 5 -

(iv) in the case of cotton (including kapas) the tax under section 3(1) shall be levied in accordance with the following provisions :-

(a) in the case of all cotton (including kapas) sold to a spinning mill in the State, the tax shall be levied from the spinning mill on the amount for which it is bought by it." *

The Tribunal, agreeing with the Department, held that the assessee's purchases of cotton, which had been imported from abroad, which amounted to Rs. 34, 61, 213-1-9 were liable to be taxed. It was the correctness of that decision which the assessee challenged before us in its application preferred under section 12-B of the Act.

The nature of the transactions was thus summed up by the Tribunal :

"The import of cotton fr











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top