BALAKRISHNA AYYAR, GANAPATIA PILLAI, RAJAGOPALA IYENGAR
Public Prosecutor – Appellant
Versus
V. M. Ramalingam Pillai – Respondent
Ramaswami, J.
And the learned Judge made the following order of reference to a Full Bench on 9th October, 1956 :-
Order of Reference to the Full Bench.
1. The point for determination in this appeal is whether section 16-A of the Madras General Sales Tax Act is ultra vires and the liability to pay the assessment levied can be challenged in the Criminal Court. If the answer is in the affirmative, then this appeal should be dismissed and if the answer is in the negative it has got to be allowed.
2. Section 16-A was inserted by the Madras Amendment Act XXV of 1957 and is designed to render nugatory the line of decisions given prior to the amendment to the effect that the jurisdiction of the Court to go into the validity of the assessment was not taken away. Prior to the enactment of this provision in 1947, which was brought into force on 1st January, 1948, this Court laid down in several decisions that the burden is upon the prosecution to establish affirmatively that the accused was liable to pay tax and that he failed to pay it : Ramaswami Iyengar v. Sivakasi Municipality (1936 M.W.N. Crl. 221), Public Procecutor v. Khader Khan 1946 (2) MLJ 461; In re Appa Rao (1949 1949 AIR(
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.