High Court of Judicature at Madras
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAGOPALAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S RAMCHANDRA IYER
Appasamy and Sons - Appellant
Versus
State of Madras - Respondent
Case No : Tax Revision Cases Nos. 167 and 168 of 1956
Decided On : 02 September 1958
The turnover, the liability of which to sales tax was in dispute, was Rs. 36, 020-10-0 for 1951-52, and Rs. 1, 12, 147-14-6 for 1952-53. The Tribunal treated the amounts as the turnover of works contracts executed by the assessee, and held that 70 per cent of the turnover was liable to be taxed. The amounts in question represented the charges collected by the assessee for carrying out embroidery work on the material supplied to the assessee by its customers. Such contracts did not involve the sale of any goods of the assessee to the customers. The principles on which the question has to be decided, whether there was any element of sale in a given works contract, have been explained by us in our judgment in T.R.C. Nos. 233 of 236 of 1956 (Since reported as Sundaram Motors (Private) Ltd. v. The State of Madras on the application of the principles laid down by the Supreme Court in State of Madras v. Gannon Dunkerley.
The assessments are set aside, and the petitions are allowed with costs in T.R.C. No. 167 of 1956. Counsel's fee Rs. 100.
Petitions allowed.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.