SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(Mad) 180

N.RAJAGOPALA AYYANGAR, RAJAGOPALA IYENGAR
Ashok Leyland Limited, Ennore – Appellant
Versus
State of Madras – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:S. Swaminathan, Advocate.

Judgment :-

The assessee, Ashok Leyland Ltd., is a firm with its factory at Ennore, within the State of Madras, where it assembles motor cars, and with an elaborate organisation spread over several States for the sale of those cars and their accessories. In the assessment year 1952-53, the Deputy Commercial Tax Officer assessed the firm to sales tax on a turnover of about 30 lakhs of rupees. He was of the view that the turnover of about 111 lakhs was not liable to be taxed under the Act. The Commercial Tax Officer took up the matter suo motu in exercise of the revisional powers vested in him by section 12 of the Madras General Sales Tax Act. He overruled the objection of the assessee, that he had no jurisdiction to revise the assessment, and eventually he held that a turnover of about 43 lakhs was also liable to be taxed.

The assessee appealed to the Appellate Tribunal. The Tribunal also negatived the contention of the assessee, that the Commercial Tax Officer had no jurisdiction to revise the assessment made by the Deputy Commercial Tax Officer. Of the turnover, the liability to tax which was in dispute, the Tribunal held that about 12 1/2 lakhs alone fell within the scope of Artic








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top