SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(Mad) 343

RAJAGOPALA IYENGAR
S. N. R. Sundara Rao and Sons – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Income Tax, Madras – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:R. Gopalaswami Ayyangar, C. S. Rama Rao Sahib, Advocates.

Judgment :-

RAJAGOPALA AYYANGAR, J.

The questions referred to this Court for determination under section 66 (1) of the Indian Income-tax Act are :

"1. Whether the proceedings under section 34 of the Act have validly been initiated and completed for the four assessment years in question ? 2. Whether the trust deeds are voidable or void and whether the assessee can be assessed in regard to the properties under section 9 of the Income-tax Act and for any period before the date of the judgement in O. S. No. 105 of 1949 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Madurai ?" *

The question raised by this reference in whether a Hindu undivided family, which is the assessee, was the owner of certain house property, so as to render it liable to be assessed on the income thereof under section 9 of the Income-tax Act. A subsidiary question that is raised is as regards the propriety or the legality of the reopening of the assessment under section 34 of the Act. The Hindu undivided family which is the assessee owned considerable properties which consisted among others of certain houses, the income from which is the subject-matter of the present dispute. Besides, it was carrying on a money lending busi










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top