SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(Mad) 355

V.RAMASWAMY
R. D. Fernandes, In Re – Appellant
Versus
. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:G. K. Govinda Bhat, V. V. Radhakrishnan, Advocates.

Judgment :-

1. This is a criminal revision directed against the conviction and sentence of the learned District Magistrate of South Kanara in S.T.C. No. 120 of 1956.

2. The facts are : The Mangalore Tile Agency, Bunder, Mangalore reported a "nil" gross turnover and a net turnover of Rs. 1, 11, 825-12-0 in its "A" return submitted for the year ending 31st March, 1951.

3. This firm is a partnership concern dealing in tiles and ridges. Its two partners are Messrs. A. M. Fernandes and R. D. Fernandes, who are related to each other. The head office of the firm is stated to be at Ratnagiri in Bombay State and Sri R. D. Fernandes is stated to be in charge of that head office. The branch at Bunder, Mangalore, is under the management of the other partner Sri A. M. Fernandes. There have been misunderstandings between the two partners. It is stated by A. M. Fernandes that he ceased to be a partner of the firm with effect from 1st October, 1951.

4. Inasmuch as the dealers failed to produce their accounts for check, the Deputy Commercial Tax Officer issued a rule 9 notice calling upon them to show cause why they should not be assessed to tax on a turnover of Rs. 2, 23, 651-8-0 for 1950-51 to the b















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top