SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(Mad) 205

RAJAGOPALA IYENGAR
Madras Port Trust (By Chairman) – Appellant
Versus
Claims Authority (Under Minimum Wages Act) – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: For

Judgment :-

RAJAGOPALAN, J.

Respondents 2 to 12 were employees of the Madras Port Trust, represented by the petitioner. Of these respondents, respondent 9 Lakshmanan, was a maistry, and the rest were shore labour mazdoors. It was a combination of time basis and piecework basis that was adopted by the employer for the payment of their monthly wages. The details of the emoluments payable to them were as follows : A mazdoor was paid every month Rs. 22 at attendance wage (retainer); a maistry was paid Rs. 27 a month. In addition, each of the employees, mazdoors as well as maistries, was paid a special dearness allowance of Rs. 15 a month, a house-rent allowance of Rs. 7 and a compensatory allowance of Rs. 3. In addition to these four items, there was a fifth, daily earnings for work done calculated on a piece rate or daily rate. Those rates were five annas a ton for handling ship cargoes; three annas a ton for loading and unloading of wagons; four annas a ton in respect of such loading or unloading from sheds, and Rs. 1-2-0 a day for stacking, etc. While the first four items enumerated above were fixed payments, the last was a variable factor, depending on the quantum of work done by ea


















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top