SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1954 Supreme(Mad) 411

N.RAJAGOPALA AYYANGAR, P.V.RAJAMANNAR
P. A. Raju Chettiar and Brothers – Appellant
Versus
State of Madras – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:K. Srinivasan, S. Krishnaswami, Advocates.

Judgment :-

RAJAMANNAR, C.J.

These two second appeals arise out of a suit, O.S. No. 112 of 1947, on the file of the Court of the Subordinate Judge of Coimbatore, brought for the recovery of a sum of Rs. 2, 995-6-3 alleged to have been wrongfully collected as sales tax. The plaintiff is a registered partnership firm carrying on business as jewellers and merchants in gold and silver bullion and specie in Coimbatore. For the year 1944-45, the Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Coimbatore, assessed the plaintiff firm to sales tax on a turnover of Rs. 51, 22, 169-12-3 in respect of the plaintiff's main shop and a turnover of Rs. 5, 27, 890-0-3 in respect of the plaintiff's branch shop dealing with sliver. There was an appeal by the plaintiff to the District Commercial Tax Officer and applications in revision to the Board of Revenue at Madras. There was a partial reduction in the assessable turnover. The plaintiff alleged that as per the final orders of the Board of Revenue a sum of Rs. 1, 34, 790-2-9 in the turnover of the branch shop and a sum of Rs. 1, 64, 749-2-0 in the turnover of the main shop, making a total of Rs. 2, 99, 539-4-9 had been wrongly assessed to a tax amounting to Rs. 2, 9









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top