SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1953 Supreme(Mad) 305

RAJAGOPALA IYENGAR, SATYANARAYANA RAO
Rm. P. R. Viswanathan Chettiar – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Income Tax, Madras – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:T. V. Viswanatha Iyer, C. S. Rama Rao Sahib, Advocates.

Judgment :-

RAJAGOPALAN, J.

The question referred to this Court under Section 66(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act ran :-

"Was the Tribunal right in holding that the assessment in this case was made within the period of limitation prescribed under Section 34(2) of the disposal of limitation prescribed under Section 34(2) of the Act ?" *

The facts necessary for the disposal of this case were never in dispute. The assessment was under Section 34 of the Act, and the assessment year was 1942-43, the accounting year having ended with April 12, 1942. The assessment was completed on 24th March, 1947. The assessment order as well as the demand notice under Section 29 of teh Act were despatched by the Income-tax Officer on March 25, 1947. They were received by the assessee on April 2, 1947.

The relevant portion of Section 34(2) of the Act ran :-

"No order of assessment............... or reassessment under subsection (1) of this section shall be made after the expiry .......... of four years, from the end of the year in which the income, profits or gains were first assessable." *

The contention of the assessee, which was negatived by the departmental authorities and the Appellate Tribunal, was tha
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top