RAJAGOPALA IYENGAR, SATYANARAYANA RAO
S. Kuppuswami – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Income Tax, Madras – Respondent
The question raised in this reference is a very short one and does not present much difficulty. The question is :
"Whether the payment of Rs. 5, 000 by the assessee to Mr. Sambamurthi was capital expenditure."
The assessee was a registered accountant. He was employed by one Mr. Sambamurthi who was also doing similar business at Karaikudi. After some time, the assessee was taken as a working partner of the Karaikudi branch where he worked till March 31, 1946. On April 1, 1946, under an agreement, evidenced by a letter addressed by the assessee to Mr. Sambamurthi and dated May 28, 1947, the assessee became the owner of the Karaikudi branch. The letter which evidences the agreement between Sambamurthi and the assessee states that the Karaikudi office became the sole concern of the assessee with effect from April 1, 1946, and that the goodwill was to be valued at half the net profits (book profits) of the Karaikudi office for the three years ending with March 31, 1949, to be limited to Rs. 5, 000 for each of the three years, if half the profits in any year exceeds Rs. 5, 000, and to be the actual amount if half the profits is below Rs. 5000. The third clause in the letter is
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.