A.KULASEKARAN
Radhabai Ammal – Appellant
Versus
N. Loganathan – Respondent
2. The petitioners respondents herein have originally filed the petition in I. A. No. 256 of 2000 for reception of additional written statement during the pendency of suit in O. S. No. 259 of 2000 raising the plea of limitation, estoppel and other grounds, which was however closed without passing any interim Order, hence an application in I. A. No. 133 of 2004 was taken out in the said A. S. No. 106 of 2003 for the very same relief. Considering the plea taken by the respondents, the first Appellate Court found that the trial Court has hastily dismissed the application of the respondents herein seeking permission to file Additional written Statement and came to the conclusion that sufficient opportunity has to be afforded to them and allowed the said application.
3. Mr. Dhanyakumar learned counsel appear
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.