K.GNANAPRAKASAM
Kannu Gounder – Appellant
Versus
Natesa Gounder – Respondent
2. The Revision petitioner is the defendant/judgment debtor. The respondent/plaintiff obtained a decree in O.S. 696/84 and the decree in his favour was confirmed in A.S. 81/99, Pursuant to the same, the decree-holder filed an execution petition for delivery of the suit property.
3. The revision petitioner objected the delivery of possession by filing a counter wherein he has stated that the plaintiff obtained a decree for mandatory injunction and that has got to be executed within a period of three years from the date of decree as per Article 135 to Indian Limitation Act and the decree was passed on 18-12-1991 and the second appeal was dismissed on 29-9-95. But, the Execution Petition was filed on 1-7-99 which is beyond the period of three years. Therefore, the plaintiff/decree-holder is not entitled to have delivery of possession after removing the building constructed in the suit property as the decree for mandatory injunction was not executed within a period of three years. The said contention was negatived
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.