SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Mad) 946

S.SARDAR ZACKRIA HUSSAIN
Shakunthala Devi – Appellant
Versus
K. S. Naidu – Respondent


Advocates:
S. Sadasivan, for Petitioner; R. Amarnath, for Respondent No. 1.

ORDER :- The petitioner in I.A. No. 7687 of 1999 in O.P. No. 2626 of 1999 on the file of the learned XV Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Madras, is the revision petitioner. The revision is filed against the dismissal of the said petition filed under Order 32, Rule 3(5) CPC seeking to appoint her as guardian to the plaintiff.

2. The petitioner Shakunthala Devi, represented by her daughter Sai Sunitha, has filed a suit for permanent injunction restraining the defendants 1 and 2 from alienating or encumbering the suit properties. It is stated that the plaintiff Shakunthala Devi is her mother and the first defendant is her father and she is the eldest daughter to them. It is further stated that the first defendant filed Title Suit No. 14 of 1978 on the file of the Judicial Commissioner at Ranchi on the ground that his wife, Shakunthala Devi, the plaintiff, was insane and was suffering from Paranoid Schizophrenia, which was allowed and divorce was granted on 30-6-1979. The first schedule property was purchased by the plaintiff as per registered sale deed dated 16-3-1964 and the second schedule property and another adjoining Flat No. 2 were also purchased by her later on out of her own





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top