SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Mad) 135

E.PADMANABHAN
K. P. Enterprises – Appellant
Versus
District Collector, Salem – Respondent


Advocates:
V. Sanjeevi, for Petitioner; P. Gunaraj, Spl. Govt. Pleader, for Respondent.

ORDER :- The writ petitioner has prayed for the issue of a writ of certiorari calling for the records of the respondent in his proceedings Roc. No. 2366/99/Mines-C dated 10-1-2000 and quash the same.

2. This Court issued Rule nisi on 23-4-2002. The respondent has been served and entered appearance through the Special Government Pleader. The respondents; have also filed a counter.

3. Heard Mr. V. Sanjeevi, learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner and Mr. P. Gunaraj, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. The writ petition was taken up for hearing on several days and detailed arguments were advanced by Mr. Gunaraj who sought to sustain the impugned order, while Mr. Sanjeevi, learned counsel for the petitioner advanced detailed contentions challenging the proceedings of the respondent dated 10-1-2000.

4. Certain undisputed facts have to be set out. The writ petitioner was granted mining lease to quarry black dimensional granite Stone owned by the State of Kerala in the lands comprised in 17/5-1, 17/7. 17/8, 17/16, Block No. 37 in Nagaroor Village, Chirayin Keezhu Taluk, Trivandrum District for a period a period of twenty years. The lease deed was execu





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top