SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Mad) 741

P.SATHASIVAM, S.SARDAR ZACKRIA HUSSAIN
Senthilkumar – Appellant
Versus
Dhandapani – Respondent


Advocates:
V. Raghavachari, for Appellants; D. Srinivasa Raghavan, for Respondents.

Judgement

P. SATHASIVAM, J. :- Unsuccessful plaintiffs in O.S. No. 57 of 85 on the file of Subordinate Judge, Tindivanam, against the dismissal of their suit filed for declaration, delivery of possession, injunction, and for accounting, preferred the above appeal.

2. The case of the plaintiffs as set out in their plaint is briefly stated hereunder :

The suit properties and other properties originally belonged to Arumugha Mudaliar. His wife is Unnamalai Ammal. They had two daughters and a son by name Mangalam, Saraswathi and Jayasubramanian. Mangalam died about 15 years back. Her son is first defendant, whose son is second defendant. Saraswathi is the second plaintiff, whose son by name Senthilkumar is the first plaintiff. Unnamalai died 20 years back. Arumugha Mudaliar executed a deed of powers of attorney in favour of the first defendant on 18-12-82, as he was unable to manage his affairs. Thereafter, it was duly revoked on 17-7-84 by means of a registered deed as Arumugha Mudaliar was fit to manage his affairs. Arumugha Mudaliar's only son Jayasubramanian died without any issues in August, 1982 leaving behind him his widow Saroja Ammal, 3rd defendant as his heir.

3. Since Arumugha Mu









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top